This feedback goes to 11

Guitar AmplifierI used to believe a person could learn more about management from a bad boss than from a good boss: it is easier to articulate what is missing from a working relationship than to notice the efforts of a good manager. Now, I think the truth is that a person always has expectations for a working relationship. The gap between expectation and reality is where learning, through constructive feedback, takes place.

When I left the workplace to attend graduate school full-time, I had a great boss. He was a great boss because he was a master of feedback: timely, thoughtful, economical, progressive feedback. Feedback is a personal information exchange we engage in throughout the working day; because of this, I would argue that maintaining a healthy feedback routine (outlined below) with other individuals is the foundation of a good working relationship.

Good feedback is timely. Work is a series of unending interruptions. It is natural to feel pestered by an employee or team member asking for feedback, but it is also important to support the priorities of the organization. Often, if I procrastinate on giving feedback, it has to do with not managing my own time well, or – this is worse – feeling I do not know the subject matter well enough to give meaningful feedback. In the latter case, my feedback should be: “I’m not the right person for an answer;” a polite “no” can also be appropriate feedback.

Good feedback is thoughtful. If I am the right person to give feedback, then it is my responsibility to really examine the item or issue in front of me. My former boss was good about this: his feedback contained questions that demonstrated he had thought about the item. Alternatively, if he had not set aside sufficient time to look at the item, he would set a time when we could sit down together. Courtesy creates goodwill.

Good feedback is economical. I mean this in two ways. First, feedback needs to be exactly as long as it needs to be. A good feedback routine gives each party a chance to clarify points, if needed, but it is a matter of personal discipline to make sure all points are salient. The second element of economical feedback means that it should be intended to maximize future efforts: it is better to determine at 10% completion that a project adds negligible value than to let sunk costs pile up. Employees and project teams will experience more satisfaction when they know all efforts are regularly analyzed to ensure added value.

Good feedback is progressive. There should be a common thread linking all feedback sessions, particularly between a manager and his employee. If a manager is unable to both criticize shortcomings of a project and praise improvements over time, he is either criticizing too much (which can paralyze an employee’s continued improvement) or leaving out recognition of improvement. As an added benefit, progressive feedback all but guarantees that an employee will know where she stands at regularly-scheduled formal reviews.

No one executes good feedback perfectly all of the time (certainly not me). And everyone experiences an occasional Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day that will derail the best intentions. In the long term, however, simply being mindful about the feedback one gives and receives goes a long way to improve working relationships.

Photo by Andres Rueda. Available under a Creative Commons 2.0 Generic license.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “This feedback goes to 11

  1. Nick Malone says:

    I should know better, but just yesterday I caught myself providing poor feedback to a developer on one of my projects because I was thinking to myself, “If I just go back to my desk and do this myself, it’ll be a lot faster”. Rather than helping the developer, the message I was sending was that they were too dumb to the job and I couldn’t be bothered to waste my time on them. Ultimately, I made myself stay and clearly explain what was needed & the steps necessary to get there. While it probably would have been faster to do it myself, now there are 2 of us who can perform the task we were working on. That’s probably a win for the organization. Long story short, I’m glad I had feedback on my mind.

    1. Jordan Eschler says:

      This is a very good thing, Nick! I think I’ve said something like this to you before, but feedback is an important link between “people” and “organizations” in the people/organizations/technology/information intersection of information management. It is a skill to develop working relationships through feedback, which seems like an onerous personal cost but is in reality an investment for the people involved and their organization.

  2. Yunju says:

    This is a great article. I just replied to Mike’s posting about how an IT manager can fix the gap between IT and business world, and I think feedback and communication is the key.

    1. Jordan Eschler says:

      Thanks, Yunju! I’m lucky to have experienced a situation where I could see the difference good feedback made in an organization. I know you’ll be able to help bridge the gap between business and IT! & I hope you are loving Portland 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s